ArgMine: A Framework for Argumentation Mining
نویسندگان
چکیده
The aim of argumentation mining is the automatic detection and identification of the argumentative structure contained within a piece of natural language text. In this paper we present the ArgMine Framework: an alignment of tools and processes that facilitate and partially automate argumentation mining research. We also report on a preliminary exploitation of the framework, where we address argumentative zoning, a sub-task of argumentation mining, whose aim is to automatically select the zones of the text that contain argumentative content. The target corpus used to train the supervised machine learning algorithms was manually annotated and is composed of Portuguese news articles, to which argumentation mining does not seem to have been applied before. Given the dataset used in our experiments and from the critical analysis of the obtained results, we conclude that lexical and syntactic-based features are not enough to successfully address argumentation zoning.
منابع مشابه
Argumentation Mining in Persuasive Essays and Scientific Articles from the Discourse Structure Perspective
In this paper, we analyze and discuss approaches to argumentation mining from the discourse structure perspective. We chose persuasive essays and scientific articles as our example domains. By analyzing several example arguments and providing an overview of previous work on argumentation mining, we derive important tasks that are currently not addressed by existing argumentation mining systems,...
متن کاملPISA - Pooling Information from Several Agents: Multiplayer Argumentation from Experience
In this paper a framework, PISA (Pooling Information from Several Agents), to facilitate multiplayer (three or more protagonists), “argumentation from experience” is described. Multiplayer argumentation is a form of dialogue game involving three or more players. The PISA framework is founded on a two player argumentation framework, PADUA (Protocol for Argumentation Dialogue Using Association Ru...
متن کاملSMACk: An Argumentation Framework for Opinion Mining
The extraction of the relevant and debated opinions from online social media and commercial websites is an emerging task in the opinion mining research field. Its growing relevance is mainly due to the impact of exploiting such techniques in different application domains from social science analysis to personal advertising. In this demo, we present our opinion summary application built on top o...
متن کاملToward Stance Classification Based on Claim Microstructures
Claims are the building blocks of arguments and the reasons underpinning opinions, thus analyzing claims is important for both argumentation mining and opinion mining. We propose a framework for representing claims as microstructures, which express the beliefs, judgments, and policies about the relations between domainspecific concepts. In a proof-of-concept study, we manually build microstruct...
متن کاملIdentifying Argumentation Schemes in Genetics Research Articles
This paper presents preliminary work on identification of argumentation schemes, i.e., identifying premises, conclusion and name of argumentation scheme, in arguments for scientific claims in genetics research articles. The goal is to develop annotation guidelines for creating corpora for argumentation mining research. This paper gives the specification of ten semantically distinct argumentatio...
متن کامل